'This Bill is not actually giving us any rights, but legalising the atrocities committed on us'.
On
Monday, the Lok
Sabha passed the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Bill,
2016. In the eyes of transgender and gender non-binary activists,
this is an act of doublespeak because the Bill, if it goes through
the Rajya Sabha, will not only fail to protect the rights of
transgender people in India, it will actively violate these rights.
Activists
from the community have condemned the passing of the Bill in its
current form, and are calling on the government to withdraw it from
consideration in the Rajya Sabha and instead pass the private
member’s bill drafted by Tiruchi Siva in the Lok Sabha.
Why
should a community so vociferously oppose a Bill that is drafted in
the name of the protection of its rights? For those who celebrated
the passing of the 2014 Supreme Court judgement affirming the rights
of transgender people (colloquially called the NALSA Bill), the
answer is obvious.
Although
the NALSA judgment was flawed in its own ways, it made some
incredible strides in the judicial recognition of the fundamental
rights of transgender people. It affirmed the self-determination of
gender identity, which upended commonsense notions about transgender
identities only being valid if certified by the medical
establishment.
It
recognised the intense discrimination faced by transgender citizens
and called for access to education, employment, healthcare and
protection from violence. It recognised that affirmative action is
needed for trans people across the country and that reservations in
education and employment were even more necessary for those
transgender people who were marginalised on the basis of caste.
In
spirit and letter, the Supreme Court judgment was a huge victory for
transgender people, who face intense stigma, discrimination and
violence across the country.
The
passing of the current Bill completely shatters the hard-won victory
of the Supreme Court judgement, both in spirit and letter.
How
the Bill will harm trans rights
Here
are only some of the ways in which the Bill will harm, rather than
help, the transgender community.
Transgender
people will be subject to certification by a District Screening
Committee to be acknowledged as transgender, and those wishing to
identify as either a man or a woman will need to go through gender
affirmation surgery (popularly known as sex reassignment surgery, or
SRS). This completely violates the Supreme Court judgment which
states that the only thing needed to acknowledge a person’s gender
identity is their word for it. The government’s Bill assumes that
all transgender people either want to or have the ability to go
through medical and surgical procedures, which is totally inaccurate.
The presence of screening committees and the need for medical
certification open up a space where a transgender person’s very
identity is subject to doubt until ‘approved’ by external
gatekeepers, which is inherently problematic. It will also inevitably
lead to more discrimination and harassment by people empowered to
screen and scrutinise trans people’s lives.
No comments:
Post a Comment