Seventy years ago, the then 58 members of the United Nations adopted its first two fundamental frameworks at the General Assembly in Paris.
According
to Amnesty International, human rights continue to deteriorate.
CIVICUS – an umbrella body for a global alliance of civil society
organisations – observes that the civil society space is shrinking.
Human rights activists and social justice movements face an uphill
battle.
Seventy
years ago, the then 58 members of the United
Nations (UN) adopted its first two fundamental frameworks at the
General Assembly in Paris:
the
Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide
on 9 December 1948; and the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights on 10 December.
Nowadays,
this achievement is recognised as Human
Rights Day. In a few countries, among them South Africa, Namibia
and Cambodia, it’s celebrated at some point during the year as a
public holiday.
Often,
the Universal Declaration is criticised as an attempt to establish
Western values to maintain a global dominance. Its eight main
drafters came from Australia, Chile, China, France, Lebanon, the
Soviet Union, Great Britain and the US. Article 1 starts with the
words:
All
human beings are born free and equal in dignity and human rights.
Critics
have questioned the relevance of these frameworks. But as I argue in
a forthcoming book, the Universal Declaration in combination with the
Charter of the United Nations served as a relevant compass in the
campaigns for decolonisation during the 1950s. But, as a detailed
historical study by Roland Burke documents, once in power
anti-colonial movements often turned their backs on the very same
rights they used for the mobilisation and recognition of their
struggle.
So
where is the world 70 years on?
The
second Secretary-General of the UN Dag Hammarskjöld popularised the
saying:
the
UN was not created to bring us to heaven, but in order to save us
from hell.
Sadly
for many people life on earth has remained close to hell. But their
numbers would not be less without the UN frameworks. Numerous human
rights principles adopted during the last 70 years might not have the
effects we would like to see. But they have not been in vain.
Setbacks
The
anchoring of genocide and crimes against humanity as part of
international law after the Nuremberg trials has been brilliantly
documented by historian and author Phillippe Sands. But
institutionalised prosecution only followed the adoption of the Rome
Statute in 1998 and the establishment of the International Criminal
Court in 2002. Even so, most war crimes remained outside of the
Court’s jurisdiction because big powers such as China, Russia and
the US, as well as a host of other states, refused to ratify it.
No comments:
Post a Comment