Mr Modi has proved more statist than the Gandhis. Before he took power he criticized Congress welfare programs as insulting to the poor but after coming to power he doubled down on those programmes.
Business
Standard : Like many global investors I am leery of big
government. But I did not come to this view on Wall Street. It came
to me growing up in India, watching lives ruined by the broken state,
including the public hospital that hastened the death of my
grandfather by assigning an untrained night aide to attempt his
emergency heart surgery.
As
an idealistic 20-something in the late 1990s, my hope was that India
would one day elect a free market reformer like Ronald Reagan, who
would begin to shrink the dysfunctional bureaucracy and free the
economy to grow faster. Looking back, I see how clueless I was.
In
Delhi every politician is wedded to big government, and there is no
constituency for free-market reform. I kept hoping for Reagan, and
India kept electing Bernie Sanders.
Prime
Minister Narendra
Modi is no exception. Five years ago he led the Hindu nationalist
Bharatiya Janata Party, known as B.J.P., to power on a Reaganesque
promise of “minimum government,” and now he seeks a second term
in the general election that ends on Thursday.
But
in office, Modi has wielded the tools of state control at least as
aggressively as his predecessors. In this campaign, he went toe to
toe with rivals, vying to see who could offer the most generous
welfare programs, and it appears to have worked. Exit
polls released Sunday showed the B.J.P. and its allies with a
commanding lead.
This
should surprise no one. India’s political DNA is fundamentally
socialist. After independence in 1947, India established a
parliamentary democracy, and a deeply meddlesome government to spread
the wealth to its impoverished masses.
But
if Indians were ready for political freedom at such an early stage of
development, I often wondered, why not economic freedom?
No comments:
Post a Comment