A lawyer who's been fighting the ride-hailing giant in court for six years wants a judge to now take into account the extra costs saddled on California taxpayers by Uber's business model.
Uber
Technologies Inc. faces a new legal attack on its refusal to
treat drivers as employees that depicts the company as mistreating
not just them but the public at large.
A
lawyer who’s been fighting the ride-hailing giant in court for six
years wants a judge to now take into account the extra costs saddled
on California taxpayers by Uber’s business model.
Drivers
being cheated out of wages and not being reimbursed for expenses
causes California to lose out on payroll taxes, attorney Shannon
Liss-Riordan said in an interview. Uber also avoids paying premiums
for workers compensation, social security, unemployment and
disability insurance, and public assistance for drivers who can’t
support themselves, she said.
The
company has warned that attempts to convert its drivers from
independent contractors to employees under California’s recently
passed AB 5 law, which goes into effect Jan. 1, will be handled as
they always have: by its armies of lawyers in courtroom combat. For
good measure, Uber is pouring tens of millions of dollars into a 2020
ballot initiative in an attempt to shield its drivers from the law.
Uber
says the driver Liss-Riordan is representing, Thomas Colopy, can’t
show its labor model causes him “irreparable harm.” His request
for the company to be forced to reclassify drivers “does not serve
the public interest, but rather only his own,” Uber said in a court
filing.
The
case was argued Thursday before US District Judge Edward Chen, who
handled one of their previous battles that ended in a $20 million
settlement without any change to the company’s business model.
Chen
said it’d be “highly unusual” to issue an immediate order, or
injunction, requiring Uber to reclassify its drivers before first
deciding whether to let the lawsuit proceed as a class action. The
judge suggested the case might stand a better chance in state court.
“I’ll
take a second look at it but I’m quite skeptical,” Chen said. But
he told Uber he’s not throwing out the case at this point.
No comments:
Post a Comment