With three years of data available to back or reject the various assertions and assumptions, Business Standard looks at the Modi govt's most disruptive economic measure, the 'note ban'.
On
November 8, 2016, Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced to the
nation that Rs 500 and Rs 1,000 currency notes — 86 per cent of all
currency
notes in circulation in value — would cease to be legal tender.
The stated objectives were unearthing black money, cracking down on
counterfeit currency, and choking terror financing.
Unsurprisingly,
there were strong reactions both in favour of and against the
unprecedented move, which would come to be known as ‘demonetisation’
or ‘note ban’. While some hailed it as a courageous step against
impropriety that was hurting the economy, others saw the move itself
as disastrous for the economy.
In
the months that followed, even as reports suggested that the
government had not come any close to achieving its stated objectives,
the government was seen patting itself on the back for the country’s
move towards becoming a ‘cashless’ economy, or, as the PM said, a
‘less-cash’ economy. Many called this an act of ‘moving goal
posts’ and rushed to label demonetisation
as an economic nightmare.
Three
years later, we have enough data to analyse and gauge the impact of
the note-ban exercise on various important sectors of the economy.
Jobs
According
to Labour Bureau's Sixth Annual Employment-Unemployment Survey, the
unemployment rate rose to a four-year high in 2016-17, when the
government demonetised old currency notes. In 2017-18, the country's
unemployment rate stood at a 45-year-high of 6.1 per cent, according
to the National Sample Survey Office's (NSSO's) periodic labour force
survey (PLFS).
Moreover,
demonetisation caused a 2-3-percentage-point reduction in jobs and
national economic activity in November and December 2016, according
to a research.
Between
2016 and 2018, five million people lost their jobs and the labour
force participation started declining suddenly between September and
December 2016 for both urban and rural men. The rate of decline
slowed down by the second half of 2017, but the general trend had
continued and there had been no recovery.
No comments:
Post a Comment