The research, which has not
been peer-reviewed by other scientists, used satellite imagery of hospital
parking lots in Wuhan - where the disease was first identified in late 2019.
Beijing dismissed as “ridiculous” a Harvard Medical School study of hospital traffic and search engine data that suggested the new coronavirus may already have been spreading in China last August, and scientists said it offered no convincing evidence of when the outbreak began.
The research, which has not
been peer-reviewed by other scientists, used satellite imagery of hospital
parking lots in Wuhan — where the disease was first identified in late 2019 —
and data for symptom-related queries on search engines for things such as
“cough” and “diarrhoea”.
The study’s authors said increased
hospital traffic and symptom search data in Wuhan preceded the documented start
of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in December 2019.
On the
new theory of the virus origin, the paper says, "Scientists collected
viral genome samples from 326 patients in Shanghai between January 20 and
February 25.
They identified two major clades, both of which included cases
diagnosed in early December 2019. The scientists noticed that genomes of six
patients with contact history related to the Huanan seafood market fell into
one kind of clade while those of three other patients diagnosed in the same
period but without exposure to the market clustered into the other clade,
suggesting multiple origins of transmission in Shanghai."
Earlier
the Chinese study into the origin of the novel coronavirus have suggested that
the virus, which caused havoc on the globe, had its origin in the famous Huanan
seafood market in Wuhan.
However, the US, especially its President Donald Trump, was not convinced by
the claims of China on the origin of the virus.
No comments:
Post a Comment