RBI's draft reconstruction scheme for YES Bank suggested a permanent write-down of these bonds outstanding as of March 5.
YES
Bank Share : Axis Trustee Services, the debenture trustees
for YES Bank’s additional tier-1 (AT-1) bond, has written to the
Reserve Bank (RBI) seeking clarity on the fate of the AT-1
bondholders. It also asked for appropriate treatment for them in the
larger interest of debt capital markets and future bankfundraising.
RBI’s
draft reconstruction scheme for YES Bank suggested a permanent
write-down of these bonds outstanding as of March 5. According to the
draft, the write-down is “in conformity with the extant regulations
issued by the RBI based on the Basel framework”.
“We
submit that such write-down of the AT-1 bonds, if given effect to,
will be an arbitrary and discriminatory decision. While the Basel-III
framework does legally permit write-off of the AT-1 bonds or
conversion of such instruments into equity, such power ought not to
be exercised in a manner in which preference is given to the common
equity holders at the cost of retail as well as other investors who
have directly or through mutual fund schemes and regulated financial
institutions subscribed to the bonds,” Axis Trustee said.
In
a letter to the RBI, Axis
Trustee has presented the central bank with alternatives that can
be looked at instead of writing down the AT-1 bonds. YES Bank has
issued AT-1 bonds worth Rs 8,920 crore.
They
have said, since the draft scheme of the RBI for reconstruction of
YES Bank sees the matter as a going concern, the bank will always
have the discretion to cancel or suspend coupon payments and delay
the exercise of call option till the time the financials of the bank
improves.
Also,
they have said global best practices place equity as subordinate to
AT-1 bonds but the RBI should consider the AT-1 bonds at par with
equity if not senior. And, the AT-1 bonds can be converted into
equity without affecting the size of the stake and value of
investment of State Bank of India.
AT-1
bondholders have been holding on to the bonds for the past 3-4 years
as long-term investors, the letter said. Moreover, in all the various
scenarios in which the bonds can be converted into equity, the
bondholders would be subjected to serious loss absorption in the
range of 70-80 per cent of face value, however, that would be more
equitable and acceptable than the proposed write down.
No comments:
Post a Comment