From academic jargon, the word 'patriarchy' has come a long way in the Indian public sphere. But it has a long way to go yet.
Contrary
to the impression one gets from the popular social media usage these
days patriarchy is not simply a system of male-dominance over women.
According to bell hooks, “Patriarchy has no gender”. Elsewhere
she says, “Patriarchy
is political-social system that insists that males are inherently
dominating, superior to everything and everyone deemed weak,
especially females, and endowed with the right to dominate and rule
over the weak.”
Patriarchy
is not just ‘women’s issues’
It
is an entangled problem of power. It is a problem for all those that
are deemed weak.
It
is regrettable that many women’s right activists who critique
patriarchy and root for gender justice among Muslims ignore the
social and cultural impact of economic
exclusion and exploitation of
Muslims. While intersectionality of identities is important it is
also equally, if not more, important to see the interlinkages of
political and economic conditions. Advocates of women’s rights who
also have a commitment to secularism face a dilemma – as do Muslim
women who do not wish to align with Hindutva elements – lest
they forfeit the security and right to dignity of the entire
community.
It
is more difficult to demand (and win) changes in economic relations
that will make women’s lives better than to demand and win laws on
violence against women. When we look at the actual use of these laws
to bring the responsible to book and convict them, it is easy to
understand why.
If
the demand is for a law that provides the majoritarian oppressor an
opportunity to dominate the weak (yes, all men are not equally
powerful) the task is easier. Without broader changes in outlook on
the forms of discrimination Muslims face, it will be difficult for
all to share the view of the criminalisation of arbitrary triple
talaq as a ‘victory’ of Muslim women.
Personal
law is not just ‘women’s issues’
The
Uniform Civil Code in India is often understood simplistically as
abolition of Muslim Personal Law, which has been declared oppressive
for Muslim women. In fact, legal pluralism itself is declared
gender-unjust. This perspective prevails not only among those who are
prejudiced against Muslims, but also among many well-meaning people.
No comments:
Post a Comment