Google's technology will not suggest gender-based pronouns because the risk is too high that its 'Smart Compose' technology might predict someone's sex or gender identity incorrectly.
Alphabet
Inc's Google
in May introduced a slick feature for Gmail that automatically
completes sentences for users as they type. Tap out "I love"
and Gmail might propose "you" or "it." But users
are out of luck if the object of their affection is "him"
or "her."
Google's
technology will not suggest gender-based pronouns because the risk is
too high that its "Smart Compose" technology might predict
someone's sex or gender identity incorrectly and offend users,
product leaders revealed to Reuters in interviews.
Gmail
product manager Paul Lambert said a company research scientist
discovered the problem in January when he typed "I am meeting an
investor next week," and Smart Compose suggested a possible
follow-up question: "Do you want to meet him?" instead of
"her."
Consumers
have become accustomed to embarrassing gaffes from autocorrect on
smartphones. But Google refused to take chances at a time when gender
issues are reshaping politics and society, and critics are
scrutinizing potential biases in artificial intelligence like never
before.
"Not
all 'screw ups' are equal," Lambert said. Gender is "a big,
big thing" to get wrong.
Getting
Smart Compose right could be good for business.
Demonstrating
that Google understands the nuances of AI
better than competitors is part of the company's strategy to build
affinity for its brand and attract customers to its AI-powered cloud
computing tools, advertising services and hardware.
Gmail
has 1.5 billion users, and Lambert said Smart Compose assists on 11
per cent of messages worldwide sent from Gmail.com, where the feature
first launched.
Smart
Compose is an example of what AI developers call natural language
generation (NLG), in which computers learn to write sentences by
studying patterns and relationships between words in literature,
emails and web pages.
A
system shown billions of human sentences becomes adept at completing
common phrases but is limited by generalities. Men have long
dominated fields such as finance and science, for example, so the
technology would conclude from the data that an investor or engineer
is "he" or "him." The issue trips up nearly every
major tech company.
Lambert
said the Smart Compose team of about 15 engineers and designers tried
several workarounds, but none proved bias-free or worthwhile. They
decided the best solution was the strictest one: Limit coverage. The
gendered pronoun ban affects fewer than 1 per cent of cases where
Smart Compose would propose something, Lambert said.
"The
only reliable technique we have is to be conservative," said
Prabhakar Raghavan, who oversaw engineering of Gmail and other
services until a recent promotion.... Read
More
No comments:
Post a Comment