The ongoing agitation in Delhi by farmers and farmers' unions from
across India, especially from Punjab and Haryana, seeks to pressure the Centre
to withdraw the laws.
The new farm laws
that aim to double farmers’ income in two years by deregulating agricultural
markets may further widen the inequalities in the sector, shows our analysis of
similar legislations from the past. By weakening the government’s price
guarantee system, the laws may end up hurting small and poor farmers, who form
80% of the sector and 23% of those who live below the poverty line, say
critics.
The privatisation
of the sugarcane industry in 1998 and the deregulation of Bihar’s Agriculture
Produce Market Committee (APMC), the state-regulated marketing board, in 2006
removed licensing barriers to agricultural
markets. But, as we explain later, this privatisation led to no significant
changes--the sugarcane farmers are still agitating for fair and timely payment
of dues and Bihar’s agricultural infrastructure has not seen any sizeable private
investment.
The ongoing
agitation in Delhi by farmers and farmers’ unions from across India, especially
from Punjab and Haryana, seeks to pressure the Centre to withdraw the laws.
Their primary demand is for a statutory minimum support price (MSP), and their
main objection is to the opening up of agricultural sales and marketing beyond
regulated APMC mandis (government-approved wholesale markets). This, they
believe, will kill the mandis and allow exploitative private players to set the
terms of purchase from farmers.
The weakening of
the established mandi system could further weaken the already floundering
system of assured procurement at MSP set by the government, farmers argue,
since only two crops--wheat and rice--are procured at MSP by government
agencies (and 21 others for which the government announces an MSP are not).
No comments:
Post a Comment