While popular notion is that Article 35A and Article 370 give J&K a special state status, the Centre has similar arrangements with several others. We explain the two statutes to demystify the issue.
With
speculation rife that the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) -led central
government could abolish or try to amend Article
35A and article 370, which give a special status to Jammu &
Kashmir, there is a lot of confusion as to what these two statutes
entail. Political parties on either side of the debate have voiced
their opinion, with some calling tinkering with Article 35A “like
setting powder keg on fire”, while others have supported the idea
calling it a move to unify of the country.
What
is Article 35A?
This
provision of the Constitution allows the Jammu
& Kashmir state Assembly to define who is and is not a
“permanent resident” of the state. To further break it down, this
provision of the Constitution gives the legislators from Jammu &
Kashmir the exclusive power to determine as to which people in or
outside the state will have special rights and privileges granted by
the state.
The
provision, inserted through a special Presidential order in 1954,
also gives the state Assembly powers to determine the recipients of
state grants, the right to purchase land and property in the state,
as well as settling permanently in the region. Other than this, the
legislative Assembly of Jammu & Kashmir can use the provision to
restrict rights of any person not classified under “permanent
resident” of the state.
Can
Article 35A be amended or repealed?
The
repealing of Article 35A could be a legal uphill task for the central
government, experts said. For any changes to be made to the
provision, the constituent Assembly of the state has to consent to
it. The constituent Assembly of the state, however, ceased to exist
in 1957. This, constitutional expert Shubhankar Dam said, made
seeking nod from the Assembly impossible.
“One
has to understand where this provision derives its powers from. When
it was introduced in 1957, the state constituent Assembly raised the
demand, which was then inserted on the recommendation of the
President.
The
clause was introduced due to compromises which the Union had to make
at that time. The time and context have to be understood,” said
Dam.
Other
experts, however, disagree and say that since there is a valid state
legislative Assembly in the state, which also has constituent powers,
any changes to Article 35A can be done by it.
No comments:
Post a Comment